MAS CAAD ETHZ 2010-2011 · ITA(Institute of Technology in Architecture), Faculty of Architecture ETH Zurich » M3: Design to Production

M3: Parametric Paravent, final presentation + critique

mascaad2010 — Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:09:37 +0000

The last phase of competition was dedicated to programming and producing the final structure. For the last two weeks the students intensively worked on the realization of the proposed structures. Various construction and material tests were necessary to prove design ideas and methodologies.The initial designers operated as project leaders and were responsible for coordinating the rest of the team. The final output was consist of the built structure and presentation explained concept, code and production. A proposal for the complete space had to be presented. Each team had 15 min. Among others the structure was judged by the following criteria: lightness, flexibility, transparency, visual permeability, impact on room and expected users,visual effect and design as a freestanding component,complexity of parametric program/ script,simplicity in production and assembly.

Click here to view the embedded video.

STUDENT WORKS

Agata Muszynska, Magda Osinka, Jorge Orozco, Hideaki Takenaga

Vacuuming a wall

Click here to view the embedded video.

A starting point for the design was a concept of producing a standard element destined for nonstandard assembly.

There were basically two main ways for continuing the project. The first was to develop the idea of a smart element and an unpredictable, „freehand” mounting of it. The second – to concentrate on the possibilities of drawing a set of hundred or 500 different elements based on the same set of connectors. Though the elements would be quite unique – connecting every single one to another one would be possible threw the standarized connectors. The final product – a wall, structure would be placed also in a layer of unpredictability.

Eventually we decided on the first path – producing a standard smart component. As assigning a cut of 500 identical parts to the robot – would mean not using the possibilities it offers, we started to search for another method to produce the elements. We reasearched on casting methods: pouring silicone, epoxy-rasin or polyurethane foam into a robot carved MDF forms. Construction weight turned out to be a problem.

We analyzed also simple laser cutting – but the idea went dead very fast as the laser cutter is limited to rather small range of thin materials.

Eventually we decided on vacuuming a folie onto a CNC milled or KUKA curved prototype model. We had several materials at hand to explore. We started with a lot of failures with different heat reaction of different materials. Some got teared, some melted too fast, the other ones didn’t want to melt at all or very slowly. Some were just too thick to mount into ETH vacuuming machine and others were just „ugly”.

We tried different kinds of PVC, Hard and Sponged Polypropylene, Polyethylene, Polycarbonate and Acryl. Thicknesses: from 0,3 mm to 2mm.

Every material behaved differently. Some were easier to control and some harder. We started to analyze what made a thin material stronger. The more bends or curves acctually the design had – the more rigid it was. After some experiments – we decided on introducing several ribs into the design.

The next issue was to optimize the connections. We started to explore press – stud joints to vacuum them within the designed element. We tried several settings for connector location. We wanted to choose an option allowing for several different assembly angles – to make the structure more dipendent on the user assembling it.

The final mock-up shows a combination of Hard sponged PVC 1mm thick sheets and Polypropylene 0.8mm boards. Each part cosists of two vacuumed prints. We designed a set of ribs to ensure rigidness of the whole structure. The proposed connection is a stud-press joint vacummed six times withing each component. Each element has 3planes set at an angle to each other. This allows various assembly positions and unpredictability within the process of mounting.

Considering more efficient wholesale material purchase – each element would cost 1 or 2 Fr. The wall structure can be used as room dividers, acoustic diffusors, a toy or mabye somehting completely different – something that only the future user can define.

The following issues can be further investigated: scale, material and element thickness, shape „closing” possibilities, optimal drawing of the ribs, connector location and its influence on the whole structure.

Jesper Thøger Christensen, Aleksandar Lalovic, Nikola Marincic, Mihye An

Bended & Twisted

Click here to view the embedded video.

Given MDF plates, as the main material to use for the construction, physical prototypes made in the workshop were essential to understand the material properties.

Likewise various structural and material tests were necessary to prove the design ideas and methodologies. Programming informed the process and made the final design realisable within the limited time available.

Using the material properties of bending was used to form a network of slightly bent plates, that allows for the forces to travel in a network, without a primary structure having a direct connection to the ground. In other words everything is connected with each other and nothing can be taken out without the structure changing.

Using material properties to guide the development of the design, there was a potential to give each element the desire to be a designer.

Potentially working with the rule of connectivity without defining a limited number of ways of connecting/relating parts to each other.

Meaning the topology is set free in the way that the bent shapes relate to each other. So patterns are not predetermined but come into being as the relations evolve.

Resulting in a pattern with different properties that can be used for different purposes such as controlling structural strength/depth, light transmittance, view etc

Ultimately finding questions instead of giving solution as what the chair has set out to do.

For the proposed design this is however not present, but the potential is still there to be investigated in the future.

In a desire to respond to the conditions of the place a conceptual differentiated shape was discovered.

A simple twist of a cylinder, embracing the two columns of the plan ,turning the inside out and outside in, creating

– an entrance through a covered intermediate space

– an opening to the facade for a view

– while at the same time creating a distinct space closing of to the workplaces around it.

from the approach of the building it creates

– a distinctive gesture that identifies the chair

– and from the staircase it gives approaching students and guests a sensation of something to be discovered.

As the overall shape is a developable surface of a cylinder it is easy to map the curves of the pattern onto the surface. This also allows for the edge of the structure to be controlled in an easy way, and make the connection to the ground straightforward.

For the pattern, various prototypes were made to study the material connections for physical load and in the end a final design that consist of a three layered triangular pattern was constructed.

Plates were not intersecting by crossing, but rather by meeting edge to surface. Resulting in a pattern where a combination of adjoining bent plates and the joint kept each plate into its bent position, creating a network of structural bent plates working together.

This only required 3 small cut outs along the centreline of the plate, not weakening the material as the earlier proposed waffle connections.

The initial idea of a double sided surfaces that turns the inside out and vice versa, was also pursued through the project. After many studies and considerations, a solution that left one side flat and the other more pointy informed the assembly process as well as it distinguished the two sides visually by only changing geometry.

Scripting

A combination of mainly Rhinoscripting with some additional use of Grasshopper have been used continuously through the project.

Grasshopper was mainly used to gain an understanding of the typology of the pattern applied and develop it further.

Whereas Rhinoscripting informed the actual process of assembly in 1:1 by scripting of intersecting plates and distinguishing layers in the structure.

In the final stages Rhinoscripting was also used to automate the preparation of drawings for the Kuka robot and naming each element for ease of assembly

Steps in Rhino

Twisting cylinder and giving it a thickness as two surfaces
Generating 2d pattern with 3 layers in grasshopper
Mapping 2d pattern to twisted cylinder by “flow along surface”
Lofting lines on two surfaces in Rhinoscripting
Orienting the planar joints onto the surface with Rhinoscripting
Using 3 layers to cut plates according to planar joints with Rhinoscripting
Unrolling bent plates column by column and naming them for final assembly with Rhinoscripting
Creating cutting paths for 6 mm drill
Exporting to machine code through Rhinoscripting

M3:Introduction to KUKA at Schlieren

mascaad2010 — Sun, 21 Nov 2010 21:04:16 +0000

A short introduction to KUKA Robot was given at Schlieren SEA working space by Manuel Kretzer, Mathias Bernhard and Tom Pawlofski. KUKA is able to work on 6 axes, however, we did a simple test with the letters “hello world”, by drawing the outline of the letters first and cutting “o”s.

M3:Design Competition: Intermediate Critique

mascaad2010 — Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:17:05 +0000

Within one week each student had the task to design a free standing “Parametric Paravent”. The structure had to be made from CNC-produced components that connect via a simple, rule based system. Self defined external factors would work as parameters to introduce variation into the structure. All components should be designed according to a system that allows for both simple fabrication and setup. The use of additional fasteners and materials should be kept to a minimum.The design of both components and final structure were continuously tested and verified by physical experiments. The Paravent had to be 2.30m high and at least 3m in length.Each student had to submit a 3pages pdf and a 1:10 model of a wall segment of the proposed design.The jury, consisted of the CAAD and Mathias Kohler, DFAB, was then select two or three projects for further development. All other students was re-distributed into the winning teams. Each student had 10 minutes to defend his idea.

Click here to view the embedded video.

STUDENT WORKS

Agata Muszynska

hedgehog agata muszynska

Magda Osinska

de-puzzle fighting magda osinska

1. assumptions.The idea is to study the interactions and relations between elements in a self-organized structure, in this case in the conference room in CAAD,HPZ Floor F building in ETH Campus.The project proposes that the relation between elements (their freedom and intelligence), can generate the structure, not the structures generate the elements.Using the idea of complexity , between every element there is cross level transformation.How very simple, abstarct rules can produce very complex system and complex behaviors?How important are the connectors and their relations? How important is one function which can organize all the structre? How important is the „smart“ elastic script, which define how to design something not defining a goal?How to code the relation between elements(not using an order for the components) and create the cooding system which allows to modify the model at every stage of the work.Implementing a few set of rules :elastic connections,autonomy of elements, individual details, free ordering of elements An easy system can become more complex … 2.logics.Loking for the logics the reserach started from the Cellular Automaton by Wolfram.A cellular automaton is a collection of “colored” cells on a grid of specified shape that evolves through a number of discrete time steps according to a set of rules based on the states of neighboring cells. The rules are then applied iteratively for as many time steps as desired.The overal plan can be replaced by writing relation between elements.it is unknown how the final product will look but it is needs the set of rules(local inteligence) which will create the whole system. Looking futher that puzzle has similar logic and thay study only relation between the similar neighbor but each element is different.I create the first game…3.typology- how they are organize?first idea – diagamatic representation of designed programme the processes of system generating , being a result of setting up few rules: the program generates structure by amplifying 2 simple rules,creating in the same time complex structures: 1-every element muliplies by creating another one in the space joint the apex, 2- when 2 elements in the generation process become touching each other in the edge-one of them wins and one looses.4.construction detailsThis game gives infinitive numbers of solutions and the possility to establish the connection between two elements.What will happend if I de-p-u-z-z-l-e my game…?Searching further for rules allowes to find the solution where all elements would be dependent of each other and could create entire systems.The location and relation between elements are determined by conectors. In the project we had to use 6mmMDF and maximum hight the structure was 280cm.The first idea was to find the rules of a joint system, which allows to connect different elements in different possitions but the stabilization of system was a concern.5.construction details- looking for solution…The next step is to establish the strategy for the relation between elements.The material and construtions detail provide the constrains and help setting up rules.In the several studies some important rules emerge.

Jesper Thøger Christensen

Jesper Thøger Christensen presentation

Click here to view the embedded video.

Jorge Orozco

line Jorge Orozco

Click here to view the embedded video.

Hideaki Takenaga

Hideaki Takenaga presentation

Mihye An

Mihye An presentation

Nikola Marincic

Nikola Marincic presentation

M3:Intro to Design Competition: "Parametric Paravent"

mascaad2010 — Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:29:55 +0000

M3_design_competition_detail

Within one week each student has the task to design a free standing “Parametric Paravent”. The structure has to be made from CNC-produced components that connect via a simple, rule-based system. Self defined external factors will work as parameters to introduce variation into the structure. All components should be designed according to a system that allows for both simple fabrication and setup. The use of additional fasteners and materials should be kept to a minimum. The design of both components and final structure should be continuously tested and verified by physical experiments. The Paravent has to be 2.30m high and at least 3m in length.

Intermediate Critique

A proposal for the complete space has to be presented. Each student has to submit a 3 pages pdf and a 1:10 model of a wall segment of the proposed design. The jury, consisting of the CAAD and Mathias Kohler, DFab, will then select two or three projects for further development. All other students will be re-distributed into the winning teams. Each student has 10 minutes to defend his/her idea. The projects that are selected for further development will be anounced after lunch.

Floor Plans: AP ITA 143-2 Geschoss F Decke AP ITA 147 Schnitt AA AP ITA 196 E_F_G 1_20 Schnitte Korridor

* Some Reference Pictures

* Useful Links

Holzverbindungen Digital Woodjoinst (data files are on the server): start

http://www.designtoproduction.com/ spinoff company of DFab Lab

http://www.erwinhauer.com/ Erwin Hauer’s works

http://matsysdesign.com/ C-Wall etc.

Google this: ‘parametric room divider’

M3:Intro to Rhino and Grasshopper

mascaad2010 — Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:27:40 +0000

M THREE: Digital Design and Production

mascaad2010 — Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:39:32 +0000

The emergence of rapid prototyping and CNC fabrication techniques in the fields of design and architecture has erased the limits of physical construction and manufacturing. Nowadays forms and structures of so far unimaginable complexity cannot only be designed but also physically produced within the digital chain – and it’s not too utopian to predict that soon complete buildings can be digitally fabricated. This approach has led to an overflow of geometrical experiments and free form structures and may soon reach its aesthetical limits.

Based on the previous modules, M3 is seeking for new strategies for the design of complex architectural forms. The students will be introduced to 3D modeling and programming methods in combination with computerized numerical control technologies. The course gives insights into the fields of advanced computing, prototyping and building fabrication. The module is focused on the relationship between design, various methods of (generative) computer modeling and the physical representation of information using CAD/CAM devices. The students are asked to examine contemporary design and production procedures and by abstracting their boundaries establish their own
“digital fabrication methodology”.

The four week program is divided into three phases:

1. Introduction and Tutorials

In the first week students will become familiar with 3D modeling in McNeel Rhino and generate a simple structure, which is processed on a laser cutter. They will further produce a generative form with the help of RhinoScript and Grasshopper for the CAAD 3D printer. Moreover there will be a full day introduction to every other rapid prototyping machine (CNC milling router, cutting plotter, etc.) at the DARCH Raplab. (raplab.arch.ethz.ch)

2. Design Competition

Within one week each student has the task to design a free standing “Parametric Paravent”. The structure has to be made from CNC-produced components that connect via a simple, rule based system. Self defined external factors will work as parameters to introduce variation into the structure. All components should be designed according to a system that allows for both simple fabrication and setup. The use of additional fasteners and materials should be kept to a minimum. The design of both components and final structure should be continuously tested and verified by physical experiments. The Paravent has to be 2.30m high and at least 3m in length.

Intermediate Critique

Each student has to submit a 3pages pdf and a 1:10 model of the proposed design. The jury, consisting of the CAAD and an invited guest, will then select two or three projects for further development. All other students will be re-distributed into the winning teams.

3. Design and Production

The last phase is dedicated to programming and producing the final structure. From now on students will intensively work on the realization of the proposed structures. Various structure and material tests are necessary to prove design ideas and methodologies. The initial designers will operate as project leaders and are responsible for coordinating the rest of the team.

Final Critique

The final output will consist of the built structure and a DIN A1 poster explaining concept, code and production.
The structure will be judged by the following criteria:
– lightness, flexibility
– transparency, visual permeability
– impact on room and expected users
– visual effect and design as a freestanding component
– complexity of parametric program/ script
– simplicity in production and assembly

MAS10_3M_flyer

MAS10_3M_presentation